A pillar of the movement · Under Energy

Electricity

The arid interior has the highest solar resource of any developed country. Sub-10c/kWh delivered consumer power. 1,000+ GW of desert solar. 40 GW of firm dispatchable pumped hydro at Alice Hub at 770 m head. The cheapest sovereign electricity in the developed world.

The current path vs the MMA plan.

Cons: the existing system and current trajectory. Pros: the integrated MMA corridor programme.

Cons of the current system & plan

Electricity prices among the highest in the OECD

Australian household electricity prices have tripled over two decades despite abundant solar resources and gas reserves. Industrial customers pay more than competitors in jurisdictions with worse renewable resources. Productivity, manufacturing competitiveness, and household budgets all suffer.

Coal exit strategy is unfunded

Coal generators are aging out of the fleet over the next decade but no integrated national replacement plan exists. The current approach relies on uncoordinated state-level investment and contracts-for-difference that have delivered cost overruns and missed timelines.

No serious firm dispatchable capacity at scale

Snowy 2.0 targets 350 GWh of storage at 2 GW - approximately 7 days of operation. Australian batteries are measured in single-digit GWh. There is no national reserve sufficient for an extended sun-and-wind drought across the continent.

Renewable build is scattered and slow

AEMO’s ISP relies on hundreds of dispersed renewable energy zones requiring new transmission to each site. Community resistance to transmission lines on rural and farming land has stalled multiple major projects. Coordination cost is enormous.

Imported fuel dependency is structural

Australia imports 80-90% of refined fuel and runs approximately 30 days of diesel stock - well below the 90-day IEA obligation. Heavy freight, mining, agriculture, and defence are all dependent on continuous imported fuel.

Nuclear adds 15-20 years to the timeline

The Coalition’s nuclear proposal targets first power in the late 2030s at $250-400 billion plus. Capital cost, regulatory framework, and skilled-workforce ramp are not in place. Coal cannot wait 15 years.

Pros of the MMA plan

The centre of Australia is the solar powerhouse it has always been

The arid interior has the highest solar resource of any developed country — 2,400–2,800 kWh/m2/year insolation across the inland Solar & Farming Zones, with potential to scale generation to 1,000 GW on under 2% of Australia's land area. The corridor brings water to it, takes electricity from it, and turns the underused centre into the engine that powers the whole continent. See MMA Memo 1 — Solar Sizing for the SBC: Reaching 1,000 GW.

Sub-10c/kWh consumer power

Legislated under 10 cents per kilowatt-hour, locked in by policy. The cheapest sovereign electricity in the developed world. Manufacturing, households, and EV charging all benefit from the same policy lever.

40 GW firm dispatchable PHES at Alice Hub

32 days of continuous national grid supply at full discharge. Frequency control, black-start capability, baseload replacement - all from one strategic asset. The largest pumped hydro system on Earth, in the location geography already provided.

Eliminates the import-fuel vulnerability

Electrification of freight, transport, and industrial process heat collapses Australia’s diesel and gas import bill - reducing the largest strategic vulnerability the country carries.

One policy decarbonises both grid and transport

Sub-10c/kWh retail electricity makes EVs cheaper to run than petrol cars on every grid, even before the grid fully decarbonises. Both transitions delivered by a single price signal.

HVDC carried on shared infrastructure

72 GW of high-voltage DC transmission rides on the same MMC viaduct as freight, water, and passenger services. No separate easement, no parallel build, no community opposition over new transmission corridors.

Export-ready surplus

Generation capacity scales well beyond Australian demand. Surplus power exports to Asia via HVDC undersea cables and AI compute services create sovereign revenue streams without depleting domestic supply.

The dollar case for Energy

CapexEnergy infrastructure capex sits across multiple corridor systems. HVDC backbone is integrated into the Phase 0 spine ($138–257 B total Phase 0 capex) and extends with the continental phases. Alice Hub PHES storage $29–53 B PHES marginal capex inside Alice Hub total $65–133 B, delivered with Phase 1 when the central engine comes online. Desert PV capacity (~1,000+ GW potential) is bought via long-duration PPAs from industry, not built by SBC, and scales with the continental corridors that link the desert generation zones to load. See Memo 19.
Tier 1 — Direct SBC revenueHVDC electricity export to Asia: $57 B/yr at maturity (locked working figure, 82.5 GW × $80/MWh; conservative case $28 B/yr still substantial). HVDC transmission domestic: $4–6 B/yr from Day 1 of Phase 0.1 (east-coast HVDC trunk on the Phase 0 spine), rising to $12–19 B/yr at full backbone maturity when the continental corridors are online. Carbon credits: $75 B/yr at maturity (working figure, range $30–150 B by carbon price sensitivity). See Memo 20 §2.1, 2.2, 2.8.
Tier 2 — Enabled outcomes and cascading upliftCheap-electricity cascade (Tier 3, not summed): household disposable income +$10 B/yr; EV uptake; real wages; pensioner energy stress retreat; inland services viability. Plus reduced fuel imports retained $30–40 B/yr at maturity (Memo 20 §3.3).
Without SBC — what Australia spends insteadWithout SBC, energy sector commits $312–520 B over 20 years (renewable+storage pathway) or $565–1,040 B (if nuclear pursued): AEMO ISP transmission $115–160 B, firming and storage $87–160 B (at 25× Alice Hub per-kWh cost), continuing energy-price relief and bailouts $110–200 B. Delivers grid capacity to maintain demand at continuing high prices. No HVDC export industry. Memo 21 §3.

Programme-wide ROI summary →  ·  Memo 19 (cost) · Memo 20 (returns) · Memo 21 (counterfactual)